"According to the current state of science and technology, the Konrad mine is ruled out as a storage site for nuclear waste! This is because the shaft is a former extraction mine, is located in a water-bearing layer and is not designed to be retrievable. No alternative sites for the disposal of so-called low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste have been examined for Konrad.
Site selection criteria have not yet been defined. The Site Selection Act could make up for these omissions. It implicitly refers to all types of radioactive waste but, quite incomprehensibly, is not to be applied to the Konrad mine.
Against this background, we as a region demand that the Federal Government
- The permanent binding exclusion of an expansion of the Konrad mine.
- A comprehensive reassessment of the Konrad mine in accordance with the current state of science and technology, including the safety calculations and analyses that are more than 25 years old.
- The consideration of an option for the retrievability of all nuclear waste to be disposed of, which is not given at the Konrad mine.
- The revision of the Konrad transport study for a realistic and up-to-date assessment of transport risks, including the possible effects of transport accidents.
We expect the state government of Lower Saxony to support these demands to the federal government and to demand that the federal government reassess the Konrad mine project as stipulated in the coalition agreement. Furthermore, it is responsible for reviewing and complying with the state of the art in science and technology as stipulated in the approval of the Konrad mine.
All local authorities in the region welcome the declarations of intent by Federal Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks to refrain from expanding capacity. On the other hand, the restrictive wording chosen once again feeds doubt and uncertainty among the population of our region with regard to the continuation of the Konrad mine project, especially as it is only a question of expanding capacity and not of reassessing the entire project.
Such a vague approach reveals the fear among those responsible in politics of having to abandon Konrad as a final repository in the event of a reassessment and of being left empty-handed due to decades of failures in nuclear waste disposal policy. However, it also justifies the concerns of the population of an entire region that, for tactical reasons, the plans are not put on the table in advance in order to prevent them from being examined in a new planning approval procedure.
Against this backdrop, we also stand by our general rejection of the final disposal of nuclear waste in the Konrad mine and are committed to a regionally coordinated approach.
We will keep our residents informed about the current status of the procedure. The members of the federal and state parliaments elected in the region are strongly expected to actively support the aforementioned demands."